Methodology

Science-Based Interviewing

A research-validated discipline for gathering accurate, complete, and defensible information in high-stakes conversations.

What it is

Evidence, not assumption.

Science-based interviewing (SBI) is a body of practice developed over decades of empirical research in cognitive psychology, memory science, deception detection, and behavioral analysis. It replaces confession-driven, accusatorial interrogation with methods designed for one purpose: to gather information that is accurate, complete, and defensible.

SBI is the operational standard already adopted across modern democratic policing — and increasingly recognized by corporate, legal, and HR investigation teams that need their fact-finding to withstand legal and reputational scrutiny.

Why it matters

The cost of getting it wrong is enormous.

Wrongful outcomes

Coerced statements have produced wrongful convictions, reversed cases, and reputational disasters.

Lost information

Pressure-based interviewing closes doors. Subjects withhold, witnesses freeze, victims disengage.

Indefensible records

Process matters. If a fact-finding process cannot be defended, neither can the decision built on it.

Six pillars

The pillars of SBI practice.

01

Rapport over coercion

Trust is the precondition for accurate information. SBI begins by establishing genuine human rapport, not pressure.

02

Open questions over leading ones

Questions are designed to invite memory, not contaminate it. Quality of question determines quality of information.

03

Active listening over interrogation

Practitioners hear what is said — and what is not — and respond to the actual content in front of them.

04

Strategic Use of Evidence

Evidence is disclosed with deliberate timing and intent — never used as a bluff or pressure tool.

05

Cognitive interviewing

Research-validated techniques help witnesses and victims retrieve detailed, accurate memory without suggestion.

06

Red teaming the theory

Working hypotheses are stress-tested before they harden — protecting cases against confirmation bias.

Legacy vs. SBI

A side-by-side comparison.

Legacy Interviewing
Science-Based Interviewing
Goal: obtain a confession
Goal: obtain reliable information
Built on assumptions of deception
Built on evidence and behavioral science
Closed, accusatorial questioning
Open, exploratory questioning
Pressure-based tactics
Rapport and active listening
Evidence used as a weapon
Evidence disclosed strategically (SUE)
Pseudoscientific lie detection
Research-validated indicators
High contamination risk
High reliability, low contamination
Difficult to defend in court
Defensible across legal scrutiny
Get Started

Upgrade the Way Your Organization Gathers Information.

Bring evidence-based interviewing, red teaming, and defensible decision-making into your agency, company, or leadership team.